Research · Between design and factory

Digital Infrastructure and Decision Support

Timely, consistent and traceable decisions across the product life cycle, built on advances in communication and computing infrastructure.

Between the design office and the factory sit the decisions both depend on: is this deviation a problem, which of these alternatives is better, what does the field data say about the next design. Today those decisions are slowed by fragmented feedback and by data that arrives too late or cannot be trusted.

This impact area builds the cross-cutting capability to decide on evidence. It connects the authoritative engineering tools, PLM, CAD, simulation and optimisation, with manufacturing, inspection and operational data through automated feedback loops, so that manufacturing and field data feed back to engineering and engineering intent propagates forward to production. The effect is shorter feedback cycles that catch deviations early, visible sources of variation that engineers can design for, and traceable evidence that links decisions to outcomes.

Who: Chalmers, including the CASE laboratory and eCommons, RISE, Qamcom and AstaZero. Industrial partners provide factory testbeds and domain validation.

How do we get factory and field data to the decision in time?

Track: Communication infrastructure: wireless communication, sensing and actuation

5G gives the low-latency, deterministic performance that closed-loop control needs on the factory floor, where jitter above 100 microseconds degrades quality. With 6G the wireless system itself becomes a sensor for position, direction and speed, which opens new ways to monitor and control.

The same infrastructure carries field data on product usage and health into maintenance and remanufacturing decisions, and enables over-the-air product updates.

How do we evaluate hundreds of alternatives instead of a handful?

Track: Computation infrastructure: model learning, data generation and decision support

AI surrogate models cut simulation times from hours to minutes. Where operational data is missing, for new products or rare failure modes, synthetic data from simulation and digital twins enables early exploration before production. Hybrid approaches combine physics-based models with data-driven methods where neither alone suffices. The track also covers the life cycle of the models themselves: versioning, validation, drift monitoring and retraining.

How do we trust the data, and the models trained on it?

Track: Data quality, interpretability and security

Cleaning, structuring and contextualising heterogeneous life-cycle data is underestimated work, and large volumes with little annotation are of limited use for learning. The track develops automated techniques such as transfer learning and domain adaptation for learning from scarce labelled data, together with the methods for data quality, traceability and explainability that AI-supported decisions require.

How do people stay in charge when AI proposes the answer?

Track: Human in the loop

Decision authority stays with human stakeholders through transparent, traceable mechanisms. The track works on meaningful oversight, calibrated trust in AI recommendations and effective collaboration between people and AI, and on what future engineers must learn in order to use data-driven decision support well.

The other impact areas